Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Denise's avatar

To answer the question, Yes, some people have lost their minds.

If you are selling something as authentic, then it better be. There needs to be a respect for ingredients & tradition of preparation that has existed over time.

I actually love to have what Is considered a food that is specific to a culture & then learn that the person preparing has only a love for the cuisine or culture, and zero biological connection.

If you are presenting as an interpretation of…go nuts! Have fun. I know my interpretation of AZ’s gazpacho is going to be quite different than sweet Melissa’s(on acct of the Nutella she’ll slip in 😂) What happened to “imitation is the highest form of flattery” isn’t that what so much of cooking really is? Recreating something we loved, or saw, or experienced or smelled or remember?

But come on….

If Eric Ripert wants to make me anything and call it Pho. I’m going to be just fine with that!

Expand full comment
JHS's avatar

They say true “jerk” must be smoked over pimento wood. That’s true but it’s expensive and there are very few sources for it in this country. I know because I import the stuff. Quite frankly there’s no way restaurants can afford to use it. Should they not make jerk chicken & pork because of this? No - do the best you can to come close. Also I’d like someone to clarify for me what’s the difference between meals that are supposedly cultural appropriation and all the fusion cuisines that you wrote about last week? Personally I think the whole cultural appropriation thing has gone a little too far.

Expand full comment
46 more comments...

No posts